The Cost of Email Within Organisations: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Copedia
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
 
Zeile 5: Zeile 5:


== Weblinks ==
== Weblinks ==
* http://homepage.ntlworld.com/cotwj1/pdf/IRMA%202000.pdf
* http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.87.6155&rep=rep1&type=pdf


{{#set:Herausgeber=Loughborough University}}
== Einzelnachweise ==
{{#set:Erscheinungsjahr=2002}}
<references />
{{#set:N=}}


[[Kategorie:Studie]]
[[Kategorie:Studie]]
[[Kategorie:E-Mail]]
[[Kategorie:E-Mail]]

Aktuelle Version vom 15. Mai 2019, 05:12 Uhr

A pilot exercise on the cost-benefit analysis of the use of internal email was performed at the Danwood Group. This forms part of a larger exercise to evaluate computer communication to help enhance performance throughout the organisation. The paper has resulted in the creation of an internal email costing process showing when it starts to become a more efficient means of communication. In this study, the times taken to read, write and perform other functions with email were measured for a sample of employees. The email content was also monitored to determine which emails were business related. It was found that nearly two thirds of all emails were non-business related at the start of the research, but this decreased to a consistent 43% towards the end.[1]

Kernaussagen

  • -

Weblinks

Einzelnachweise