Project Debriefing (Softlab): Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus Copedia
K |
|||
| (12 dazwischenliegende Versionen von 3 Benutzern werden nicht angezeigt) | |||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| + | ==Methoden== | ||
| + | ===[[Softlab]]=== | ||
| + | *What went well? | ||
| + | *Why did it go well? | ||
| + | *What were the main benefits? | ||
| + | *What would you do in the same way again? | ||
| + | *What went wrong? | ||
| + | *Why did it go wrong? | ||
| + | *What were the main problems? | ||
| + | *What will I avoid next time? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Quelle: [http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/F2_10_Pannek_Slides.pdf Vom Prebriefing zum Debriefing - Systematische Projekterfahrungssicherung] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Fallbeispiele== | ||
| + | * [[Audi AG]] | ||
| + | |||
==Literaturhinweise== | ==Literaturhinweise== | ||
| + | *[http://www.cogneon.de/Leistungen/Schulung COGNEON Seminar Projektkickoff und Projektreview] | ||
*Norman L. Kerth: [http://www.cogneon.de/node/193 Post Mortem - Projekte erfolgreich auswerten] | *Norman L. Kerth: [http://www.cogneon.de/node/193 Post Mortem - Projekte erfolgreich auswerten] | ||
| + | *[http://www.acs.org.au/Certification/Documents/KM/2003KM1-ImplementingCoPs.pdf Implementing Communities of Practice and After Action Reviews] | ||
| + | *[http://www.alnap.org/pubs/pdfs/aar_case_study.pdf AAR Case Study] | ||
| + | *[http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/F2_10_Pannek_Slides.pdf Vom Prebriefing zum Debriefing - Systematische Projekterfahrungssicherung] ([http://www.softlab.de Softlab]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Kategorie:Wissensmanagement-Methode]] | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 14. November 2017, 16:45 Uhr
Methoden
Softlab
- What went well?
- Why did it go well?
- What were the main benefits?
- What would you do in the same way again?
- What went wrong?
- Why did it go wrong?
- What were the main problems?
- What will I avoid next time?
Quelle: Vom Prebriefing zum Debriefing - Systematische Projekterfahrungssicherung
